AI Agent Architecture: The Complete Enterprise Blueprint (2025-2026)

Executive Overview: The Agentic AI Revolution

The enterprise software landscape is experiencing a fundamental architectural shift. Where artificial intelligence once played a supporting role through assistants and chatbots, autonomous AI agents are now assuming operational control—directly orchestrating workflows, making contextual decisions, and executing complex business processes with minimal human intervention.

This transformation is accelerating rapidly. Gartner predicts that 40% of enterprise applications will include integrated task-specific agents by 2026, a dramatic increase from less than 5% in 2025. More striking still, Futurum Research reported that agent-based AI will drive up to $6 trillion in economic value by 2028.

For enterprise architects, technology leaders, and organizations seeking competitive advantage in 2025 and beyond, understanding AI agent architecture is no longer optional—it’s strategic necessity.

---

Part 1: Foundational Concepts

What Is AI Agent Architecture?

AI agent architecture refers to the internal structure that enables autonomous systems to observe their environment, process information, reason about options, execute actions, and improve through learning. Unlike traditional software systems that respond to explicit inputs, AI agents operate in continuous perception-reasoning-action loops, adapting behavior based on context and outcomes.

The critical distinction lies in autonomy. An AI assistant responds to user queries and depends on human input for execution. An AI agent independently identifies opportunities, plans multi-step workflows, and executes them through integrated tools and APIs—operating more like a digital employee than a search interface.

Why 2025 Marks the Inflection Point

Three converging factors create the perfect environment for agentic AI at scale:

Mature Foundation Models: Large language models have reached sophistication levels enabling nuanced reasoning, multi-step planning, and domain-specific adaptation previously impossible. They can now understand context, evaluate trade-offs, and explain their reasoning transparently.

Enterprise Infrastructure Readiness: Cloud-native architectures, microservices patterns, containerization, and event-driven systems that most enterprises have invested in over the past five years align naturally with agent deployment models. This infrastructure enables rapid scaling and independent agent management.

Organizational Appetite for Autonomous Automation: A clear C-level mandate exists for technology-driven growth and measurable ROI, with agentic AI adoption becoming a competitive necessity. Organizations no longer view automation as cost-reduction alone—they see it as operational transformation.

However, Gartner also predicts that by the end of 2027, more than 40% of agentic AI projects will fail or be canceled due to escalating costs, unclear business value, or inadequate risk controls. Success requires more than deploying the latest models; it demands architectural rigor and governance.

---

Part 2: Core Architecture Components

Every enterprise AI agent relies on five interconnected systems working in concert:

1. Perception & Input Layer

The perception module observes and interprets the agent’s environment. This extends far beyond text input.

Input Types:

• Natural language (email, chat, voice transcription)
• Structured data (database queries, API responses)
• Sensor data (IoT streams, time-series metrics)
• Visual information (document images, screenshots)
• Event streams (workflow triggers, system alerts)

Real-World Example (Retail): Walmart uses AI-based agents that analyze shopping behavior, past purchases, and current interactions to customize product suggestions to shoppers, with McKinsey estimating that 35% of Amazon’s sales come from its AI-driven recommendation engine. These agents perceive customer interaction patterns and infer intent in real-time.

The perception layer translates raw inputs into internal representations the agent can reason over. This requires careful data normalization, format consistency, and quality validation—failures here cascade through the entire agent.

2. Memory Architecture

An agent without memory is merely reacting to the present moment. True enterprise agents require sophisticated memory systems spanning multiple timescales.

Working Memory (Short-Term Context)

• Session-specific information retained during active interactions
• Current task state, intermediate reasoning, active conversation threads
• Typical retention: minutes to hours
• Implemented through context windows in LLM calls

Persistent Memory (Long-Term Recall)

• Longitudinal history spanning days, weeks, or years
• Previous interactions, user preferences, historical outcomes, learned patterns
• Implemented through vector databases with semantic search
• Typical retention: months to indefinite

Integration Pattern: Advanced agents combine both layers. During execution, an agent retrieves relevant historical context from persistent memory, merges it with immediate session data in working memory, and uses this unified context for reasoning and planning.

Real-World Example (Financial Services): A South American bank deployed agents that process PIX payments through WhatsApp, with customers sending photos or text descriptions that agents interpret, confirm, and execute autonomously. These agents must maintain customer history (persistent memory) while tracking individual transaction details (working memory) to evaluate fraud risk and transaction appropriateness.

3. Planning & Reasoning Module

This component maps goals to actionable steps. The planning module doesn’t simply execute predefined rules—it reasons about multiple potential strategies and selects the one most likely to achieve objectives given current context.

Planning Approaches:

Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: The agent verbalizes its reasoning process step-by-step, making logic transparent and enabling human oversight.

Graph-Based Planning: The agent constructs decision trees or knowledge graphs representing potential action sequences, then traverses them to find optimal paths.

Hierarchical Planning: Breaking complex goals into subgoals and intermediate steps, with each layer of planning increasingly detailed.

Evaluator-Optimizer Pattern: The agent generates multiple candidate plans, evaluates each against success criteria, and selects the strongest approach.

Tool Chaining: Orchestrating multiple specialized tools in sequence, where each tool’s output feeds into the next tool’s input.

Real-World Example (Healthcare): Mass General Brigham deployed ambient documentation agents across 800 physicians that autonomously draft clinical notes from patient conversations, with 60% of providers reporting an increased likelihood of extending their clinical careers and 80% spending more time engaging with patients. These agents must reason through patient presentation, identify relevant clinical history from records, structure findings in standard medical documentation format, and confirm accuracy—a multi-step planning process executed autonomously.

4. Action Execution Layer

After reasoning about what to do, the agent must actually perform actions in external systems. This layer manages tool invocation, API calling, and workflow orchestration.

Tool Categories:

API Integrations: Direct connections to business systems via REST, GraphQL, or gRPC APIs. Examples: Salesforce CRM, Jira project management, Slack messaging, financial systems, data warehouses.

Function Calling: Structured invocation of specific functions with parameters validated against schema. Modern LLMs like GPT-4 and Claude provide native function-calling capabilities enabling direct integration.

Database Operations: Direct querying and updates through connection pools and ORM layers, managed with transaction controls and rollback mechanisms.

Workflow Orchestration: Integration with workflow engines like Apache Airflow, Temporal, or cloud-native orchestration platforms, enabling asynchronous task execution and complex dependency management.

File & Document Operations: Reading documents, extracting structured data, generating reports, processing uploads.

Real-World Example (Logistics): UPS reportedly saved $300 million annually using AI-driven route optimization. These agents integrate with multiple systems: GPS data, weather APIs, traffic patterns, delivery time windows, vehicle capacity constraints, and fuel efficiency models. The agent reasons through optimization trade-offs and directly executes routing commands against dispatch systems.

5. Feedback & Learning Loop

The agent observes action outcomes, compares them against intended goals, and adjusts future behavior accordingly.

Feedback Sources:

• Explicit user ratings or corrections
• Implicit signals (email opened, meeting attended, task completed)
• System metrics (latency, error rates, cost efficiency)
• Business outcomes (revenue impact, customer satisfaction scores)
• Anomaly detection systems flagging unexpected results

Learning Mechanisms:

• Prompt optimization through observed success/failure patterns
• Tool selection refinement based on historical effectiveness
• Memory pruning and context prioritization
• Confidence calibration for autonomous action

This feedback loop is essential for continuous improvement but presents governance challenges—organizations must ensure agents learn appropriate behaviors rather than encoding bias or gaming metrics.

---

Part 3: Enterprise Architecture Tiers

Successful agentic deployments progress through three distinct tiers where trust, governance, and transparency must precede autonomy.

Foundation Tier: Tool Orchestration with Guardrails

The entry point for enterprise agentic AI, focused on building organizational trust through transparency and control.

Characteristics:

• Agents orchestrate tools within carefully defined boundaries
• Every action is logged, audited, and explainable
• Human approval gates exist for high-risk operations
• Bias monitoring and fairness checks are embedded
• Data lifecycle governance ensures compliance

Technical Implementation:

• Comprehensive monitoring infrastructure capturing every agent decision
• API rate limits and cost controls preventing runaway spending
• Semantic validation of agent outputs against business rules
• Encrypted tool integrations with fine-grained access controls
• Vector database implementations with data retention policies

Real-World Example (Financial Services Compliance): A major bank implements agents to process loan applications. The Foundation Tier includes:

• Agent reviews customer documents and extracts key data
• System validates extracted data against known patterns
• Agent flags edge cases or inconsistencies for human review
• All decisions logged with reasoning explanations
• Demographic fairness monitoring identifies potentially discriminatory outcomes
• Rejected applications receive detailed explanation templates

Governance Focus: Financial services implementations need bias testing and human checkpoints, while healthcare requires PHI and FHIR compliance, retail needs fairness monitoring, and manufacturing integrates safety and workforce impact assessment.

Workflow Tier: Autonomous Pattern Automation

Building on Foundation Tier trust and transparency, Workflow Tier enables agents to execute complex, multi-step workflows with reduced human intervention.

Characteristics:

• Five core automation patterns emerge:
  • Prompt Chaining: Sequential tool calls where each output feeds into next input
  • Routing: Intelligent branching to specialized agents or workflows
  • Parallelization: Multiple agents executing concurrent tasks
  • Evaluator-Optimizer: Generating and comparing alternative approaches
  • Orchestrator-Workers: Coordinator agent directing specialized worker agents
• Sophisticated error recovery and fallback mechanisms
• Context persistence across extended workflows
• Performance optimization for throughput and latency
• Cost management through intelligent batching and caching

Real-World Example (Healthcare Administration): Cedars-Sinai’s CS Connect handles patient intake, provides preliminary recommendations, and frees clinicians to focus on direct care, with over 42,000 patients using it and 77% of AI-suggested treatment plans rated optimal. This represents Workflow Tier automation:

• Agent receives patient registration submission (trigger)
• Parallel agents collect medical history, insurance verification, and symptom triage
• Orchestrator agent synthesizes findings and routes to appropriate clinic
• Agent confirms appointment availability and sends confirmation
• System learns from outcomes to improve triage accuracy

Autonomous Tier: Self-Directed Agent Ecosystems

The most advanced tier, where agents make significant autonomous decisions within guardrails, adapt their own strategies, and coordinate with other agents.

Characteristics:

• Agents have genuine decision authority within defined policy boundaries
• Limited or absent human approval gates for routine decisions
• Sophisticated multi-agent coordination and debate
• Continuous self-evaluation and capability expansion
• Advanced planning algorithms handling complex trade-offs

Current State: Most companies lack regulatory approval for autonomous patterns due to compliance constraints demanding the transparency and control only mature Foundation implementations provide. Autonomous Tier deployment remains largely experimental except in non-regulated domains.

Emerging Example (Supply Chain Optimization): Organizations are beginning autonomous experiments in supply chain where risk is more contained:

• Demand forecasting agents analyze historical data, market signals, and social trends
• Procurement agents negotiate supplier terms autonomously within budget constraints
• Logistics agents dynamically rebalance inventory across warehouses
• All agents coordinate through continuous messaging, with exceptions escalated to humans

---

Part 4: Industry-Specific Implementations

Healthcare: Clinical Decision Support & Administrative Automation

Healthcare represents the highest-stakes application domain for AI agents, where patient safety and care equity directly drive architecture decisions.

Tier Progression by Use Case:

Clinical Documentation (Autonomous Scribe Agents) Ambient scribes represent healthcare AI’s first breakout category, generating $600 million in 2025 (+2.4x year-over-year), with Abridge holding 30% market share and Ambience at 13%, though both trail incumbent Nuance’s DAX Copilot at 33%.

Architecture:

• Audio perception: Real-time transcription of patient-clinician conversations
• Clinical NLP: Entity extraction identifying diagnoses, medications, vital signs
• Persistent memory: Access to patient’s complete medical history via EHR integration
• Planning: Structuring findings in standard clinical documentation format (SOAP notes, ICD codes)
• Action: Direct integration with EHR systems (Epic, Oracle, athenahealth)
• Feedback: Clinician review and correction, aggregated to improve accuracy

Impact: Hospitals like AtlantiCare save 66 minutes per provider daily by reducing documentation time, with one provider reporting documentation took one hour for every five hours of patient care.

Prior Authorization & Insurance Pre-approval Healthcare’s largest administrative burden—processing authorization requests across payers.

Abridge is partnering with Highmark Health to deploy AI for real-time prior authorization, automating the complex workflow of evidence gathering, policy matching, and approvals.

Patient Intake & Triage Virtual assistants for symptom triage and patient intake like Cedars-Sinai’s CS Connect handle patient intake, provide preliminary recommendations, and free clinicians to focus on direct care.

Architectural Considerations:

• Data Privacy: PHI (Protected Health Information) governance with HIPAA compliance
• Interoperability: Open architectures like the Model Context Protocol (MCP) are allowing new AI agents to directly access functional data across care organizations
• Bias & Fairness: Healthcare AI carries discrimination risk—agents must be monitored for demographic disparities
• Explainability: Clinicians require transparent reasoning for clinical decisions
• Liability: Clear audit trails and human override capabilities for defensive practice

2026 Outlook: The future of healthcare AI is likely to be modular, AI-native architecture that integrates agentic AI mesh and enables interoperability across siloed systems, built on curated, high-quality clinical data.

Financial Services: Autonomous Trading, Underwriting, and Compliance

Financial services offers lower-touch but higher-velocity automation opportunities. The regulatory environment is maturing to permit increasing autonomy.

Loan Underwriting & Credit Decisioning

Agent workflow:

1. Perception: Document collection (income statements, tax returns, credit reports, employment verification)
2. Reasoning: Multi-factor credit analysis using proprietary scoring models
3. Planning: Routing to specialized agents for complex cases
4. Action: Credit decision, term generation, system recording
5. Feedback: Loan performance tracking informing model updates

Impact: Agents predict demand, track inventory, and handle returns or refunds with minimal human oversight, automating loan processing and compliance checks using document intelligence techniques.

Fraud Detection & Real-Time Monitoring

Continuous agent operation over transaction streams:

• Perception: Real-time transaction data, device fingerprinting, geolocation
• Reasoning: Fraud probability scoring using ensemble models
• Action: Transaction approval/suspension, alert generation
• Feedback: Cardholder dispute data refining detection

Compliance & Regulatory Reporting

Financial services implementations require bias testing and human checkpoints for defensible decision-making with demographic impact tracking, while data lifecycle governance incorporates aggressive tokenization, consent management, and fairness verification protocols.

Architectural Considerations:

• Auditability: Every decision must survive regulatory examination
• Explainability: Rules-based fallback for complex decisions
• Risk Management: Hard limits on autonomous transaction values
• Speed: Latency measured in milliseconds for trading operations
• Data Governance: Transaction data qualifies as sensitive PII requiring encryption

2026 Outlook: Workflow tier advancement for loan underwriting and algorithmic trading requires mandatory human checkpoints, comprehensive bias testing, and equitable outcome monitoring. Autonomous patterns remain experimental due to regulatory constraints.

Retail: Personalization, Inventory, and Customer Service

Retail offers the most permissive environment for agent autonomy, as customer satisfaction serves as the primary success metric rather than regulatory compliance.

Personalized Shopping & Recommendations

Agent architecture:

• Perception: Browsing history, purchase history, search queries, demographic data, real-time inventory
• Memory: Customer preferences, loyalty tier, previous returns, communication preferences
• Reasoning: Multi-objective optimization balancing relevance, margin, inventory, and customer fairness
• Action: Product recommendations, promotional offers, dynamic pricing
• Feedback: Engagement metrics, conversion tracking, return analysis

Walmart uses AI to enhance replenishment of stock, leading to a 10–15% decrease in overstocking and out-of-stock conditions.

Inventory & Demand Forecasting

Agent perception spans:

• Historical sales patterns and seasonality
• Current inventory levels across all locations
• Weather forecasts and local events
• Competitor activity and pricing
• Supply chain disruptions

Agents autonomously adjust replenishment orders within budget constraints.

Customer Service Automation

AI-driven virtual agents and chatbots now manage anything from order status to return and refund handling, with e-commerce chatbots reported to reduce support costs by approximately 65%.

Architectural Considerations:

• Personalization at Scale: Vector databases storing preferences for hundreds of millions of customers
• Fairness: Retail implementations need fairness monitoring to prevent discriminatory practices that could harm brand reputation or violate emerging regulations
• Cost Efficiency: Real-time personalization must operate within compute budgets
• Explainability: Less critical than regulated industries, but transparency builds trust

2026 Outlook: Retail organizations demonstrate how tier progression enables personalization at scale while ensuring customer fairness across diverse populations, with autonomous pattern exploration in dynamic pricing and supply chain optimization becoming viable within controlled contexts.

---

Part 5: Technical Implementation Patterns

Deployment Architecture

Modern AI agent deployments leverage cloud-native patterns:

Containerized Agent Services

• Individual agents packaged as Docker containers
• Deployed via Kubernetes orchestration for automatic scaling
• Service meshes (Istio) managing inter-agent communication
• ConfigMaps and Secrets managing credentials and policies

Event-Driven Architecture

• Agents subscribe to event streams representing business triggers
• Message brokers (Kafka, RabbitMQ, EventBridge) decoupling agents from source systems
• Each agent operates independently without tight coupling
• Event-sourcing pattern enabling complete audit trails

Serverless Invocation

• AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, or Azure Functions for stateless agent operations
• Triggered by webhooks, scheduled events, or API calls
• Autoscaling based on demand
• Pay-per-invocation cost model

Integration Patterns

Model Context Protocol (MCP)

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) enables agents to now directly invoke services and orchestrate workflows rather than generating suggestions for backends to execute. MCP represents an emerging standard for agent-system communication.

API-First Integration

• RESTful or GraphQL APIs as the primary integration boundary
• OpenAPI schemas defining agent capabilities
• Rate limiting and quota management preventing resource exhaustion
• Versioning enabling backward compatibility during agent evolution

Tool Abstraction Layer

• Standardized tool definitions independent of underlying implementations
• Tool registry enabling agent discovery of available capabilities
• Error handling and fallback mechanisms
• Permission boundaries enforcing principle of least privilege

Observability & Governance

Comprehensive Monitoring

• Every agent decision logged with reasoning explanation
• Distributed tracing across multi-agent workflows
• Metrics dashboards tracking execution patterns, latency, error rates
• Cost monitoring identifying runaway agents

Audit & Compliance

• Immutable audit logs retained per regulation
• Automated compliance checking (e.g., bias monitoring dashboards)
• Anomaly detection identifying unusual agent behavior
• Explainability reporting for regulatory inquiries

Security Architecture

• Encrypted communication between agents and tools
• Secret management for API credentials
• Network segmentation isolating agents from sensitive systems
• Threat detection monitoring for agent compromise

---

Part 6: 2025 Reality Check & 2026 Projections

Market Adoption Status (2025)

By the end of 2025, most enterprise applications will have embedded AI assistants serving as precursors to agentic AI, though a common misconception is referring to these AI assistants as agents, a misunderstanding known as “agentwashing”.

Actual agent deployment remains nascent. Most organizations are:

• Piloting Foundation Tier implementations in non-critical workflows
• Building governance frameworks before scaling
• Addressing integration complexity with existing systems
• Experiencing higher-than-expected implementation costs

Expected Developments (2026)

Projected Capabilities

• 40% of enterprise applications will be expected to include autonomous agents by 2026
• Multi-agent coordination becoming standard practice
• More sophisticated reasoning and planning algorithms
• Improved integration with legacy enterprise systems

Emerging Standards

• Model Context Protocol adoption accelerating across platforms
• Enterprise agent development platforms maturing (AutoGen, LangGraph, CrewAI)
• Governance frameworks becoming industry-standard
• Liability and insurance frameworks clarifying

Organizational Evolution

• AI agent developers becoming distinct career specialization
• New organizational roles (Agent Architect, Agent Observer, Agent Auditor)
• Cross-functional teams combining AI expertise with domain knowledge
• Increased focus on ethical AI and bias mitigation

Investment & Economics

Agentic AI adoption is becoming a competitive necessity with clear C-level mandate for technology-driven growth and measurable ROI, though McKinsey warns that agentic AI represents a “moment of strategic divergence” where early movers will redefine competitive dynamics.

However, implementation remains expensive. Organizations should expect:

• 6-18 month deployment timelines for production agents
• Multi-million dollar infrastructure investments
• Significant data preparation and system modernization
• Ongoing costs for monitoring, governance, and continuous improvement

The inflection toward positive ROI typically occurs 12-24 months post-deployment as process automation benefits accumulate.

---

Part 7: Challenges & Mitigation Strategies

The Implementation Reality Gap

Challenge: Organizations consistently underestimate integration complexity.

Mitigation:

• Comprehensive system audit before agent deployment
• API readiness assessment identifying gaps
• Data quality evaluation and cleansing
• Staged rollout starting with pilot workflows

Challenge: Data pipeline failures are one of the most prevalent causes of AI agents operating incorrectly in production.

Mitigation:

• Invest heavily in data infrastructure before agent development
• Implement robust data validation and transformation pipelines
• Establish data quality SLAs
• Create fallback mechanisms when data quality degrades

Governance & Risk Management

Challenge: Organizations struggle to maintain human oversight while capturing autonomy benefits.

Mitigation:

• Define clear decision authorities for each agent
• Implement escalation policies for edge cases
• Maintain human-in-the-loop for high-impact decisions
• Regular audits of agent decision-making

Challenge: Bias and fairness risks in agent decision-making.

Mitigation:

• Implement demographic monitoring dashboards
• Regular fairness audits across agent populations
• Transparent reasoning for sensitive decisions
• Diverse training data and model validation

Technical Debt & Evolution

Challenge: Agents built with quick-and-dirty approaches become unmaintainable.

Mitigation:

• Invest in modular, composable agent architectures
• Version control for prompts and tool definitions
• Comprehensive testing frameworks (unit, integration, acceptance)
• Regular technical audits and refactoring

---

Part 8: Building Your Agent Architecture Strategy

Assessment Framework

Current State Analysis

• Which workflows generate highest business value?
• Which processes involve repetitive, rule-based decisions?
• What are integration points with existing systems?
• What governance and compliance requirements exist?

Capability Readiness

• Cloud infrastructure maturity
• Data quality and accessibility
• Team AI expertise
• Change management capacity

Risk Profile

• Customer impact of agent errors
• Regulatory constraints
• Data sensitivity
• Financial exposure

Phased Roadmap

Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1-3)

• Pilot Foundation Tier agents in low-risk workflows
• Build governance frameworks and monitoring
• Develop agent development playbooks
• Train teams on agent concepts and architecture

Phase 2: Expansion (Months 4-12)

• Deploy agents to additional business domains
• Transition Foundation Tier pilots to production
• Develop Workflow Tier capabilities
• Establish communities of practice

Phase 3: Optimization (Months 12-24)

• Evaluate autonomous patterns in appropriate domains
• Implement multi-agent orchestration
• Optimize for cost and performance
• Expand organizational agent footprint

Technology Stack Considerations

Frameworks & Orchestration

• Microsoft AutoGen: Enterprise-grade multi-agent orchestration
• LangGraph: Flow-based agent composition
• CrewAI: Team-style agent coordination
• Lindy: No-code enterprise SaaS for digital workers

Foundation Models

• GPT-4o: Strong reasoning, long context
• Claude Opus 3: Balanced capability and cost
• Specialized models for domain-specific tasks (medical, legal, financial)

Infrastructure

• Cloud platforms: AWS, Google Cloud, Azure with Kubernetes
• Vector databases: Pinecone, Weaviate, or cloud-native options
• Workflow orchestration: Temporal, Apache Airflow
• API management: Kong, AWS API Gateway

Observability

• Distributed tracing: Jaeger, Datadog
• Logging: ELK Stack, Splunk
• Metrics: Prometheus, Datadog
• Custom dashboards for agent-specific KPIs

---

Conclusion: The 2025-2026 Imperative

AI agent architecture represents the next foundational shift in enterprise technology, comparable in scope to the cloud migration of the 2010s or the microservices revolution of the 2020s. Organizations that treat agent adoption as another pilot project will lag competitors who recognize it as strategic transformation.

Success requires:

1. Architectural Rigor: Moving beyond prompt engineering to systematic design patterns, governance frameworks, and integration infrastructure
2. Governance Maturity: Embedding trust, transparency, and accountability from foundation tier upward rather than bolting them on post-deployment
3. Cross-Functional Collaboration: Breaking silos between AI teams, domain experts, security, compliance, and business leaders
4. Continuous Evolution: Recognizing that agent architecture will evolve rapidly through 2026 and beyond

By 2026, AI agents may be as ubiquitous as operating systems and as essential as web browsers, with the next frontier being persistent AI companions that know schedules, habits, and communication styles. Organizations beginning their agent journeys today will shape this future. Those that delay risk disruption.

The strategic window is 2025-2026. The time to build your blueprint is now.